User:MLavazza/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
!Location and description of the issue | ! colspan="2" |Location and description of the issue | ||
!Wiki-related issue | !Wiki-related issue | ||
!IDP transcription-related issue | !IDP transcription-related issue | ||
!Proposed solution | !Proposed solution | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''110,128-3''': it is rendered as unicode in the transcription, but I believe it would be better to make it an image, because the slope and length are important in relation to 110,128-2. I added the picture for 110,128-3 in the wiki but it is not tagged | | colspan="2" |'''110,128-3''': it is rendered as unicode in the transcription, but I believe it would be better to make it an image, because the slope and length are important in relation to 110,128-2. I added the picture for 110,128-3 in the wiki but it is not tagged | ||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''111,194''': in the transcription, the third graphic should be identical to the first, but instead it is currently identical to the second | | colspan="2" |'''111,194''': in the transcription, the third graphic should be identical to the first, but instead it is currently identical to the second | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''115,210''': unclear why alternative 1 and 2 were both used: shouldn't we use just alternative 1 in all three occurrences? | | colspan="2" |'''115,210''': unclear why alternative 1 and 2 were both used: shouldn't we use just alternative 1 in all three occurrences? | ||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''130,128''': There seems to be a mistake in the transcription on the IDP site: file 130,128-5 is where 130,128-2 should be. | | colspan="2" |'''130,128''': There seems to be a mistake in the transcription on the IDP site: file 130,128-5 is where 130,128-2 should be. | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|Multiple tags: | |Multiple tags: | ||
| | | | ||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|111,125-2 | |111,125-2 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|111,130-1 | |111,130-1 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|111,130-2 | |111,130-2 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 45: | Line 49: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|111,156 | |111,156 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 50: | Line 55: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|127,22 | |127,22 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 55: | Line 61: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|127,25 | |127,25 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 60: | Line 67: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|Ms-132: contains many "FT" characters (listed by running process_v2.php with '132'): how should we handle them? | |Ms-132: contains many "FT" characters (listed by running process_v2.php with '132'): how should we handle them? | ||
| | | | ||
Line 65: | Line 73: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|Ms-134: one case of "FT" as above | |Ms-134: one case of "FT" as above | ||
| | | | ||
Line 70: | Line 79: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|Ms-135: a few cases of "FT" as above | |Ms-135: a few cases of "FT" as above | ||
| | | | ||
Line 75: | Line 85: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|Ms-136: several cases of "FT" as above | |Ms-136: several cases of "FT" as above | ||
| | | | ||
Line 80: | Line 91: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|Ms-137: several cases of "FT" as above | |Ms-137: several cases of "FT" as above | ||
| | | | ||
Line 85: | Line 97: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|Ms-144: one case of "FT" as above | |Ms-144: one case of "FT" as above | ||
| | | | ||
Line 90: | Line 103: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |||
|Ts-230a: one case of "FT" as above | |Ts-230a: one case of "FT" as above | ||
| | | | ||
Line 95: | Line 109: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''144,28v-4.png''' is identical to 137,135a-4, but they have different semantic tags | | colspan="2" |'''144,28v-4.png''' is identical to 137,135a-4, but they have different semantic tags | ||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''153b,59v''': the order (and naming) of the three drawings is incorrect | | colspan="2" |'''153b,59v''': the order (and naming) of the three drawings is incorrect | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''155,1r''' is identical to 109,112, but they have different semantic tags | | colspan="2" |'''155,1r''' is identical to 109,112, but they have different semantic tags | ||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''164,83''': is a part of the transcription missing? (along with the drawing?) "Wenn man mich die Regel..." | | colspan="2" |'''164,83''': is a part of the transcription missing? (along with the drawing?) "Wenn man mich die Regel..." | ||
| | | | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''208,8r''' is identical to 105,92, but they have different semantic tags | | colspan="2" |'''208,8r''' is identical to 105,92, but they have different semantic tags | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2" |Ts-213: | |||
|same problem with 213,164r, 213,592r | |same problem with 213,164r, 213,592r | ||
| | | | ||
Line 140: | Line 145: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ms-148: | | rowspan="3" |Ms-148: | ||
|148,11v-2 is identical to 117,59-3 but does not have the same semantic tags | |148,11v-2 is identical to 117,59-3 but does not have the same semantic tags | ||
| | | | ||
Line 160: | Line 161: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ms-150,2: the second drawing (Wuerfel) is missing from the transcription, probably because of a markup error; the face should be numbered 150,2-1 and the Wuerfel 150,2-2 | | colspan="2" |Ms-150,2: the second drawing (Wuerfel) is missing from the transcription, probably because of a markup error; the face should be numbered 150,2-1 and the Wuerfel 150,2-2 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ms-153a,63v should actually be called 153a,63r | | colspan="2" |Ms-153a,63v should actually be called 153a,63r | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|220,49: couldn't find the file | | colspan="2" |220,49: couldn't find the file | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ts-222: most of the files were not drawn on purpose for this typescript and were recycled either from Ms-117 or Ms-118. However, I was unable to find the files for 222,41-1 and 222,136: are these examples of situations where you created the files on your own based on other drawings? | | colspan="2" |Ts-222: most of the files were not drawn on purpose for this typescript and were recycled either from Ms-117 or Ms-118. However, I was unable to find the files for 222,41-1 and 222,136: are these examples of situations where you created the files on your own based on other drawings? | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2" |228: | |||
|228,175-1: couldn't find the file | |228,175-1: couldn't find the file | ||
| | | | ||
Line 195: | Line 192: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|239: | | rowspan="2" |239: | ||
|239,49: couldn't find the file | |239,49: couldn't find the file | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 12:34, 14 April 2024
Location and description of the issue | Wiki-related issue | IDP transcription-related issue | Proposed solution | |
---|---|---|---|---|
110,128-3: it is rendered as unicode in the transcription, but I believe it would be better to make it an image, because the slope and length are important in relation to 110,128-2. I added the picture for 110,128-3 in the wiki but it is not tagged | X | X | ||
111,194: in the transcription, the third graphic should be identical to the first, but instead it is currently identical to the second | X | |||
115,210: unclear why alternative 1 and 2 were both used: shouldn't we use just alternative 1 in all three occurrences? | X | X | ||
130,128: There seems to be a mistake in the transcription on the IDP site: file 130,128-5 is where 130,128-2 should be. | X | |||
Multiple tags: | ||||
111,125-2 | ||||
111,130-1 | ||||
111,130-2 | ||||
111,156 | ||||
127,22 | ||||
127,25 | ||||
Ms-132: contains many "FT" characters (listed by running process_v2.php with '132'): how should we handle them? | ||||
Ms-134: one case of "FT" as above | ||||
Ms-135: a few cases of "FT" as above | ||||
Ms-136: several cases of "FT" as above | ||||
Ms-137: several cases of "FT" as above | ||||
Ms-144: one case of "FT" as above | ||||
Ts-230a: one case of "FT" as above | ||||
144,28v-4.png is identical to 137,135a-4, but they have different semantic tags | X | X | ||
153b,59v: the order (and naming) of the three drawings is incorrect | X | |||
155,1r is identical to 109,112, but they have different semantic tags | X | X | ||
164,83: is a part of the transcription missing? (along with the drawing?) "Wenn man mich die Regel..." | X | |||
208,8r is identical to 105,92, but they have different semantic tags | ||||
Ts-213: | same problem with 213,164r, 213,592r | |||
Issue with the transcription: shouldn't the drawing of the two globes in 213,80r actually be in 213,79v? | ||||
Ms-148: | 148,11v-2 is identical to 117,59-3 but does not have the same semantic tags | |||
148,18v is identical to 148,16v-3 but has different semantic tags | ||||
In 148,18r, there seems to be a mistake in the transcription: in the two sentences "... consists of ... and ...", the last graphic should be a rotated "L", not a full square | ||||
Ms-150,2: the second drawing (Wuerfel) is missing from the transcription, probably because of a markup error; the face should be numbered 150,2-1 and the Wuerfel 150,2-2 | ||||
Ms-153a,63v should actually be called 153a,63r | ||||
220,49: couldn't find the file | ||||
Ts-222: most of the files were not drawn on purpose for this typescript and were recycled either from Ms-117 or Ms-118. However, I was unable to find the files for 222,41-1 and 222,136: are these examples of situations where you created the files on your own based on other drawings? | ||||
228: | 228,175-1: couldn't find the file | |||
228: where you have "description TBA", we can use those from the drawings these are copies of | ||||
239: | 239,49: couldn't find the file | |||
239,121 is identical to 115,207-1, but does not have the same semantic tags |