5,520
edits
User:MLavazza/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | rowspan="5" |111 | ||
|'''111,194''': in the transcription, the third graphic should be identical to the first, but instead it is currently identical to the second | |||
| | | | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''111,125-2''': multiple tags | |||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''111,130-1''': multiple tags | |||
| | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''111,130-2''': multiple tags | |||
|'''111, | |||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''111, | |'''111,156''': multiple tags | ||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''' | | colspan="2" |'''115,210''': unclear why alternative 1 and 2 were both used: shouldn't we use just alternative 1 in all three occurrences? | ||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''' | | colspan="2" |'''126,1-2''' and '''126,1-3''' are identical to 124,165-2 and 124,165-3 respectively, but have different semantic tags | ||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |X | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|'''127,25''': multiple tags | |'''127,25''': multiple tags | ||
|X | |X | ||
|X | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="2" |'''130,128''': There seems to be a mistake in the transcription on the IDP site: file 130,128-5 is where 130,128-2 should be. | |||
| | |||
|X | |X | ||
| | | | ||