Jump to content

User:MLavazza/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="wikitable
{| class="wikitable"
! All
!Location and description of the issue
! Tagged
!Graphics-related issue
!Transcription-related issue
!Proposed solution
|-
|-
| style="vertical-align: top;" | {{#ask: [[Category:Ts-310]]
|110,128-3: it is rendered as unicode in the transcription, but I believe it would be better to make it an image, because the slope and length are important in relation to 110,128-2. I added the picture for 110,128-3 in the wiki but it is not tagged
[[Category:All PNG files]]
|X
|?Has title
|X
| mainlabel=-
|
| sort = Has sort key
|-
| format = ol
|111,194: in the transcription, the third graphic should be identical to the first, but instead it is currently identical to the second
| limit=100
|
}}
|X
| style="vertical-align: top;" | {{#ask: [[Category:Ts-310]]
|
[[Has graphic type::+]]
|-
|?Has title
|115,210: unclear why alternative 1 and 2 were both used
| mainlabel=-
|
| sort = Has sort key
|
| format = ol
|
| limit = 100
|-
}}
|119,77v: Description to be added
|
|
|
|-
|130,128: There seems to be a mistake in the IDP site: file 130,128-5 is where 130,128-2 should be.
|
|
|
|-
|164,83: is a part of the transcription missing? (along with the drawing?) "Wenn man mich die Regel..."
|
|
|
|-
|Ts-222: most of the files were not drawn on purpose for this typescript and were recycled either from Ms-117 or Ms-118. However, I was unable to find the files for 222,41-1 and 222,136: are these examples of situations where you created the files on your own based on other drawings?
|
|
|
|-
|Multiple tags:
|
|
|
|-
|111,125-2
|
|
|
|-
|111,130-1
|
|
|
|-
|111,130-2
|
|
|
|-
|111,156
|
|
|
|-
|127,22
|
|
|
|-
|127,25
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-132: contains many "FT" characters (listed by running process_v2.php with '132'): how should we handle them?
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-134: one case of "FT" as above
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-135: a few cases of "FT" as above
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-136: several cases of "FT" as above
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-137: several cases of "FT" as above
|
|
|
|-
|Ts-230a: one case of "FT" as above
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-144: all graphics seem to be taken from other deliveries (other manuscripts); one case of "FT" as above
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-147: tagging semantico carente
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-153b,59v: the order (and naming) of the three drawings is incorrect
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-155,1r is identical to 109,112, but they have different semantic tags
|
|
|
|-
|Ts-208,8r: the drawing is the same as in 105,92, but the semantic tags are different
|
|
|
|-
|Ts-212: 212,XIX-149-3-1, 212,XIX-149-3-2, 212,XIX-149-5, XVI-116-15 -- I couldn't find these: what Ms or Ts were they drawn for?
|
|
|
|-
|Ts-213:
|
|
|
|-
|same problem with 213,164r, 213,592r
|
|
|
|-
|Issue with the transcription: shouldn't the drawing of the two globes in 213,80r actually be in 213,79v?
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-148:
|
|
|
|-
|148,11v-2 is identical to 117,59-3 but does not have the same semantic tags
|
|
|
|-
|148,18v is identical to 148,16v-3 but has different semantic tags
|
|
|
|-
|In 148,18r, there seems to be a mistake in the transcription: in the two sentences "... consists of ... and ...", the last graphic should be a rotated "L", not a full square
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-150,2: the second drawing (Wuerfel) is missing from the transcription, probably because of a markup error; the face should be numbered 150,2-1 and the Wuerfel 150,2-2
|
|
|
|-
|Ms-153a,63v should actually be called 153a,63r
|
|
|
|-
|220,49: couldn't find the file
|
|
|
|-
|228:
|
|
|
|-
|228,175-1: couldn't find the file
|
|
|
|-
|228: where you have "description TBA", we can use those from the drawings these are copies of
|
|
|
|-
|239:
|
|
|
|-
|239,49: couldn't find the file
|
|
|
|-
|239,121 is identical to 115,207-1, but does not have the same semantic tags
|
|
|
|}
|}